Contents
ABSTRACT
We carried out a bibliometric analysis of the research production in the field of evolutionary computation in Latin America (LA) for the period 1980-2020. The bibliometric method is applied with a quantitative review of the published literature. The search for publications was carried out in the Web of Science database through the terms that are most commonly used to identify this field of study. The data analysis the data analysis used Microsoft Office tools (excel and Access) to organize our data were used to organize our data: authors, institutions, journals, countries and thematic categories. It was completed with VOS Viewer 1.8.16 to generate a co-authorship network map of authors, and the development of base maps for collaboration by countries. We have identified the first Latin American publications in the journals Archivos de Biologia y Medicina Experimentales and Desarrollo Economico-Revista de Ciencias Sociales; this research field reached a consolidation in the 2000s with the opening of the first graduate programs in this geographical region; there is an extraordinary number of LA scholars active in this research field and an increasing number of academic institutions mainly from Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Chile and Colombia; while the Asian and European production in this research field is about 30%, the respective LA contribution is just 4.9%. The present study attempts to document the progress of evolutionary computation in Latin America, an issue that has gained relevance for society, especially in recent years. No studies have been generated that cover the Latin American region, and therefore it is hoped that these findings will be useful for the development of scientific and public policies and also for other future work.
INTRODUCTION
There are several factors involved in the maturity of a new research field:[1–3] a substantial scientific production and impact by a solid network of scholars, the support of graduate programs, as well as the recognition of external communities of scholars.[4–6] The research collaboration has been considered as an essential tool to construct a scientific community and leads to the development of cognitives structures shared by all its members.[7]
The bibliometric method has been used to measure the evolution of scientific fields. The main element of analysis is the bibliographic data on published Works:[8] original articles, reviews, books, book chapters, proceedings, as well as the indicators generated from this analysis: impact factors, number of citations, frequency of publications, institutional statistics, etc.[9]
Evolutionary computation
This branch of computational science is oriented to the study of bio-inspired metaheuristics which are stochastic search and optimization techniques. Such properties constitute “algorithms that are supported in two concepts: exploration and exploitation of the search space”.[10–13] The foundation of this new research field lies in algorithms with a structure close to the Darwinian principles of evolutionary biology.[14] This scheme is supplemented with the principles of modern genetics and selectionism.[10] The combination of these three theories is called Neo-darwinism or modern synthesis of genetics.[15,16]
The genetic algorithm, which is also called evolutionary algorithm, was generated in the first decades of the XX century. The first works on the evolution of biological systems by computers were published in the mid XX century.[15,16] Holland and Schwefel were pioneers in the development of new informatic models in genetics.[17] Their work constitued the fundation of evolutionary computation in the published litearture. The applications of computational software were first developed by R.M. Friedberg.[18] LA this field of research was initiated in the 1970 decade.[10]
Literature review
There are three basic processes in the field of evolutionary computation that were developed in the 1960-1970 decades:[11] (i) evolutionary programming, (ii) evolution strategies, and (iii) genetic algorithms. This field of research has become a transdisciplinary approach with multiple applications. In particular, in Latin America (LA) the interest in this field started in the decade of 1980 with diverse applications: texts clustering,[19] drinking water access,[20] industry management,[21] stock market prediction,[22] scheduling,[23] electricity supply,[24] manufacturing,[25] data mining.[26]
The published production in this field of research includes the following topics: definitions, basic concepts,[27] development of algorithms,[28] optimization of algorithms or genetic programing,[29] application of artificial intelligence,[30] evolutionary optimization, multi-objectives and hiper-heuristic.[11] The trandisciplinary relation of evolutionary computation has been also studied.[31] However, there are very few bibliometric analysis on this research field: bussiness inteligence in the agricultural sector,[32] data visualization, data networks, genetic programation, software developments and analysis of computation journals.[33–35] Hoevere, as far as we know, there are no studies on the bibliometry of evolutiionary computation. This precisely the aim of the present study is to characterize the progress of this field of research through the analysis of the WoS databases. In particular, we are interested in answering the followin points: which were the first research publications in this research fiueld? when does this field reached its maturity? which are the principal research collboratrions? In the following section the respective search strategics are presented, as well as our results and conclusions.
DATA AND METHODS
The present study uses the method associated to the systematic review of the published literatura on the field of evolutionary computation by Latinamerican researchers using the WoS databases. This method three different types of reviews use: analysis of dominio, analysis based in theories, and analysis of methods. The first case involves five stages:[36] estructured review, review based in frames of reference, quantitative bibliometric review, theories review, and finally a hibrid review. However, in the present work we will use the bibliometric review as an essential tool to analyze different trends in this new field of research.[37]
In this framework, the general aim of the present work is to determine the evolution of the Latin America output in the field of evolutionary computation, dando respuesta a las preguntas: which were the first research publications in this research fiueld? when does this field reached its maturity? which are the principal research collboratrions? Figure 1 shows the flow chart followed for literature search, retrieval, organization and analysis. The model applied is SPAR-4-SLR.[14]
Assembling
We use the databases of the Web of Science (WoS) in the period 1980-2020. In particular, for characterizing the consolidation process the evolution of the Latin America output in the field of volutionary computation. The productivity and impact will correspond to the publications and citations in mainstream journals included in WoS. The publications were retrieved by matching the names of the Latin American institutions with the articles from the WoS databases. Our search strategy included the following features:
TS=(Algoritmos evolutivos or Computación evolutiva or computo evolutivo or algoritmos genéticos or Programacion Evolutiva or Estrategias Evolutivas or Programacion evolutiva or Estrategias de evolucion or Evolutionary Computing or Genetic Algorithms or Evolutionary Programming or Evolutionary Strategies or Evolutionary algorithms or Evolutionary programming or Evolution strategies) AND CU=(Argentina, or Belice or Bolivia or Brazil or Chile or Colombia or Costa Rica or Cuba or Ecuador or El Salvador or Guatemala or Jamica or Honduras or Mexico or Nicaragua or Panama or Paraguay or Peru or Puerto Rico or Republica Dominicana or Uruguay or Venezuela). Belize was considered due to its influence in terms of language and culture.
Arranging
The 16,888 documents were retrieved in blocks of 500 documents and were included in an Excel spreadsheet with normalized data: authors addresses, titles of journals, subject areas, country of the journal. We were interested in keeping extra data on each journal such as its impact factor in JCR, the respective quartile and country of edition. In particular, if the country corresponds to the LA region. Our data sample was translated to an Access file that made esay our data analysis. We needed to perform a double counting in order to determine the data on production by country and institution.
The assignment of the number of publications by continent was performed with the same methodology used for the case of LA publications: the WoS filters were used in order to label the production per year for each continent. Finally, we built the matrices required to use the VOSViewer software in the generation of network maps. Also, free software was used free for the developmen to the maps the LA collaborations with the countries of other continents.
Assessing
Our results are supported by a bibliometric analysis of the published production on evolutionary computation by LA researchers: evolution of the number of articles and the respective number of citations, distribution of authors and institutions, journals and areas of knowledge, as well as scientific collaborations.
RESULTS
Production and scientific impact
We have included in Table 1 the LA production and impact for the period 1980-2020 in the field of evolutionary computation. Our search indicates that the first LA documents in this field were published in 1980. The data included in this table shows that it was not until 1991 when the LA output started a steady trend. The number of citations per year is impressive. The average number of citations increased from 59 citations per article in 1991 to 65 citations per article in 2003 but in 2012 has reached just 27 citations per article. Of course, the latter result is expected to increase in the near future.
According to our bibliometric search, the first document published in the scientific literature was 1964. We registered just 53 new publications in the following 12 years but afterwards the respective growth dynamics became impressive as it is shown in Table . It is important to notice that in LA most of the graduate programs were funded in the 1970 decade. Our findings will show that some of these programs contributed with a substantial contribution to the research production in this field of knowledge. This was also true in other research fields.[27]
Geographical distribution
The distribution of publications by countries of LA is included in Table 2. While Brazil has contributed with 48.4% of this output, the following four LA countries (Mexico, Argentina, Chile and Colombia) have a similar contribution (44.5%) to the whole LA output. The respective number of publishing institutions corresponds to a similar share: 41.6% in both cases. This LA trend has been observed in others research fields.[38]
Scientific production
Figure 2 depicts the evolution of the scientific production in mainstream journals in the field of evolutionary computation for different geographical regions. Asia and Europe have the largest production (39.1% and 30.6%, respectively), while USA and Canada contribute with 18% of the whole production. The Latin American region contributes with just 4.9% of this production. We can appreciate also in Figure that since 2000 there a steady increase of the scientific production in this research field an all-geographical region. While Coello[11] has pointed out that the original ideas on evolutionary computation arised in the 1950-60 decades, we can appreciate in Figure that a steady increase in the respective scientific production only started in the 2000 decade.
The LA research production in this field involves 63.2% of original papers, 3.8% in proceedings, 2.5% in review articles and book chapters. The original articles were published in 3,358 journals, of these 10.9% are regional and the rest mainstream journals. The latter, most of them in the first JCR quartiles: 35.4% in the first quartile and 31.8 in the second quartile. In Table 3 we have included the distribution of the LA production published in these journals. PLOS ONE and Astronomy and Astrophysics
Years | Publications | Citations |
---|---|---|
1980-1990 | 5 | 11 |
1991-1994 | 57 | 2377 |
1995-1998 | 248 | 6953 |
1999-2002 | 608 | 24566 |
2003-2006 | 1403 | 51822 |
2007-2010 | 2461 | 5572 |
2011-2014 | 3529 | 14735 |
2015-2018 | 5538 | 55399 |
2019-2020 | 3039 | 11516 |
TOTALS | 16888 | 281721 |
Country | Number Institutions | Publications | %Institutions | %Publications |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil | 1547 | 15244 | 41.6 | 48.4 |
Mexico | 424 | 6657 | 11.4 | 21.1 |
Argentina | 512 | 2807 | 13.8 | 8.9 |
Chile | 263 | 2601 | 7.1 | 8.3 |
Colombia | 348 | 1947 | 9.3 | 6.2 |
Cuba | 123 | 475 | 3.3 | 1.5 |
Venezuela | 91 | 429 | 2.4 | 1.4 |
Ecuador | 141 | 425 | 3.8 | 1.3 |
Uruguay | 59 | 332 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
Panama | 18 | 177 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
Costa Rica | 38 | 148 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
Peru | 46 | 105 | 1.2 | 0.3 |
Bolivia | 36 | 53 | 1.0 | 0.2 |
Guatemala | 13 | 19 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
Paraguay | 10 | 17 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
Jamaica | 5 | 15 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Nicaragua | 7 | 10 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Dominican Republic | 7 | 8 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
El Salvador | 5 | 6 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Honduras | 3 | 5 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Belize | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Puerto Rico | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
TOTALS | 3722 | 31512 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
have published the largest number of articles in this research field (about 200 papers each). The mainstream journals with the largest number of citations correspond to Nature, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics. In Table there are no regional journals because the number of published documents in this field is very low: only 11% of the total production was published in regional journals.
Subject areas
There is also a diversity of subject areas included in the LA production in this research field. Table 4 shows the subject areas that reached at least 1% of the whole production. The most representative subject areas correspond to Computer Science and Engineering, each with 20.9% (13.7%) and 6.6% (11.7%) of the production (citations), respectively. From the diversity of themes inlcuded in Table , we can conclude that this research field has a transdisciplinary approach with disciplines that include Ecology, Management Science, Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Genetics and Heridity and even Astronomy and Astrophyics.
No. | Journals | Publications | Quartile | No. | Journals | Citations | Quartile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Plos One | 237 | Q2 | 1 | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 9608 | Q1 |
2 | Astronomy and Astrophysics | 202 | Q1 | 2 | Nature | 7656 | Q1 |
3 | Expert Systems with Applications | 170 | Q1 | 3 | Astronomy and Astrophysics | 7184 | Q1 |
4 | Applied Soft Computing | 166 | Q1 | 4 | IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation | 6344 | Q1 |
5 | IEEE Latin America Transactions | 133 | Q4 | 5 | Expert Systems with Applications | 4666 | Q1 |
6 | Information Sciences | 93 | Q1 | 6 | IEEE Transactions on Power Systems | 4046 | Q1 |
7 | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 86 | Q1 | 7 | Plos One | 3873 | Q2 |
8 | Scientific Reports | 79 | Q1 | 8 | Astrophysical Journal | 3522 | Q1 |
9 | IEEE Access | 77 | Q2 | 9 | Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series | 3000 | Q3 |
10 | Electric Power Systems Research | 72 | Q2 | 10 | Applied Soft Computing | 2925 | Q1 |
11 | Astrophysical Journal | 68 | Q1 | 11 | Information Sciences | 2923 | Q1 |
12 | Soft Computing | 67 | Q2 | 12 | Science | 2800 | Q1 |
13 | Computers and Operations Research | 61 | Q2 | 13 | Journal of Biogeography | 2355 | Q1 |
14 | Mathematical Problems in Engineering | 57 | Q3, Q4 | 14 | Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2294 | Q1 |
15 | Ieee Transactions on Power Systems | 56 | Q1 | 15 | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America | 2273 | Q1 |
16 | Ieee Transactions on Evolutionary Computation | 50 | Q1 | 16 | European Journal of Operational Research | 2144 | Q1 |
17 | Energies | 47 | Q3 | 17 | Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering | 1726 | Q1 |
18 | Genetics and Molecular Research | 47 | Q4 | 18 | Australian Journal of Botany | 1672 | Q3 |
19 | International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems | 46 | Q1 | 19 | Ecology Letters | 1442 | Q1 |
20 | Swarma and Evolutionary Computation | 46 | Q1 | 20 | Administrative Science Quarterly | 1414 | Q1 |
21 | Applied Sciences-Basel | 45 | Q2, Q3 | 21 | International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems | 1390 | Q1 |
22 | Bmc Genomics | 43 | Q2 | 22 | Astronomical Journal | 1328 | Q1 |
23 | Neurocomputing | 41 | Q1 | 23 | Biological Reviews | 1308 | Q1 |
24 | Frontiers in Microbiology | 40 | 24 | Molecular Ecology | 1294 | Q1 | |
25 | European Journal of Operational Research | 40 | Q1 | 25 | Genetics | 1274 | Q2 |
26 | Computers and Industrial Engineering | 40 | Q1, Q2 | 26 | Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems | 1235 | Q1, Q2 |
Subjects | Publications | % | Subjects | Citations | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer Science | 5722 | 20.9 | Computer Science | 61616 | 13.7 |
Engineering | 4540 | 16.6 | Engineering | 52570 | 11.7 |
Environmental Sciences and Ecology | 995 | 3.6 | Astronomy and Astrophysics | 29033 | 6.5 |
Operations Research and Management Science | 775 | 2.8 | Environmental Sciences and Ecology | 27664 | 6.2 |
Science and Technology – Other Topics | 745 | 2.7 | Science and Technology – Other Topics | 22539 | 5.0 |
Mathematics | 723 | 2.6 | Operations Research and Management Science | 15100 | 3.4 |
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology | 620 | 2.3 | Genetics and Heredity | 14162 | 3.2 |
Physics | 593 | 2.2 | Biochemistry and Molecular Biology | 14033 | 3.1 |
Chemistry | 586 | 2.1 | Plant Sciences | 12730 | 2.8 |
Genetics and Heredity | 531 | 1.9 | Evolutionary Biology | 11595 | 2.6 |
Automation and Control Systems | 519 | 1.9 | Chemistry | 11402 | 2.5 |
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 485 | 1.8 | Mathematics | 9809 | 2.2 |
Zoology | 482 | 1.8 | Business and Economics | 8818 | 2.0 |
Plant Sciences | 475 | 1.7 | Physics | 8354 | 1.9 |
Energy and Fuels | 472 | 1.7 | Life Sciences and Biomedicine – Other Topics | 7999 | 1.8 |
Mathematical and Computational Biology | 460 | 1.7 | Zoology | 7205 | 1.6 |
Evolutionary Biology | 439 | 1.6 | Energy and Fuels | 6389 | 1.4 |
Agriculture | 384 | 1.4 | Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology | 6138 | 1.4 |
Business and Economics | 373 | 1.4 | Agriculture | 6021 | 1.3 |
Telecommunications | 371 | 1.4 | Mechanics | 5996 | 1.3 |
Life Sciences and Biomedicine – Other Topics | 293 | 1.1 | Automation and Control Systems | 5449 | 1.2 |
Materials Science | 280 | 1.0 | Microbiology | 5031 | 1.1 |
Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology | 266 | 1.0 | Pharmacology and Pharmacy | 4802 | 1.1 |
Collaboration Patterns
Figure 3 depicts the collaboration network of authors for the LA production in this research field. It is easy to identify some of the leading authors in the network: Carlos Artemio Coello Coello, Oscar Castillo and Erik Cuevas from Mexico; Leandro dos Santos, Frederico G. Guimares and Ricardo Takahasi from Brazil; and Patricia Melin from Mexico. This map depicts the collaboration network of just 25 publications of the more representative authors in this research field. The color code indicates the different authors involved in the network and their connection to other authors.
We have included in Figure 4 the map corresponding to the LA collaboration with other countries. We have included for each country the number of papers published in this period, as well as the number of countries for each continent involved in the LA collaboration and the respective percentage. There is a high percentage (64%) of the number of publications published within the same LA countries. As expected, the countries with an intense LA collaboration are Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Chile and Colombia. The collaborations with Europe and North America contribute with 19% and 11%, respectively. There is a weak collaboration with Asia (3.4%). We include in Table 5 the list of countries of each continet involved in the LA collaboration in this research field. The countries wuth the largest number of publications with LA countries are USA, Spain, England, Germany, Italy, Portugal and China.
Distribution of academic institutions
Finally, inTable 6 we have included the LA academic instituions with the largest activity in this reserach field. Most of these institutions correspond to Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Chile and Colombia, mainly public and privte universities, as well as research centers.[9] The lack of specific public policies in this reserach field has not promoved the creation of newe reserach groups in this field in other LA countries.[39]
No. | European (19.5%) | African (0.7%) | Asian (3.4%) | Latin American (64%) | North American (11%) | Oceania (1.2%) | European/Asian (0.2%) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country | Collaboration by assigment direction | Country | Collaboration by assigment direction | Country | Collaboration by assigment direction | Country | Collaboration by assigment direction | Country | Collaboration by assigment direction | Country | Collaboration by assigment direction | Country | Collaboration by assigment direction | |
1 | Spain | 2181 | South Africa | 132 | Peoples R China | 458 | Brazil | 15244 | USA | 4984 | Australia | 519 | Russia | 108 |
2 | France | 1580 | Egypt | 38 | Japan | 250 | Mexico | 6657 | Canada | 681 | NewZealand | 87 | Georgia | 3 |
3 | England | 1214 | Kenya | 18 | India | 205 | Argentina | 2807 | Greenland | 1 | Papua N Guinea | 6 | ||
4 | Germany | 1031 | Nigeria | 17 | Iran | 120 | Chile | 2601 | NewCaledonia | 4 | ||||
5 | Italy | 834 | Morocco | 16 | South Korea | 92 | Colombia | 1947 | Fiji | 2 | ||||
6 | Portugal | 568 | Tunisia | 15 | Israel | 86 | Cuba | 475 | ||||||
7 | Netherlands | 327 | Uganda | 14 | Saudi Arabia | 71 | Venezuela | 429 | ||||||
8 | Belgium | 254 | Algeria | 9 | Taiwan | 64 | Ecuador | 425 | ||||||
9 | Switzerland | 231 | Tanzania | 8 | Malaysia | 59 | Uruguay | 332 | ||||||
10 | Scotland | 194 | Cameroon | 7 | Pakistan | 40 | Panama | 177 | ||||||
11 | Sweden | 185 | Ghana | 7 | Turkey | 39 | Costa Rica | 143 | ||||||
12 | Denmark | 148 | Mozambique | 7 | Singapore | 33 | Peru | 105 | ||||||
13 | Austria | 136 | Dem Rep Congo | 5 | Thailand | 28 | Bolivia | 53 | ||||||
14 | Finland | 97 | Eritrea | 5 | Vietnam | 19 | FrenchGuiana | 19 | ||||||
15 | CzechRepublic | 86 | Madagascar | 5 | U Arab Emirates | 17 | Guatemala | 19 | ||||||
16 | Poland | 82 | Senegal | 5 | Indonesia | 16 | Paraguay | 17 | ||||||
17 | Norway | 62 | Zambia | 5 | Cyprus | 12 | Jamaica | 15 | ||||||
18 | Greece | 54 | Zimbabwe | 5 | Philippines | 12 | Haiti | 10 | ||||||
19 | Hungary | 54 | Angola | 4 | Bangladesh | 10 | Nicaragua | 10 | ||||||
20 | Ireland | 44 | Benin | 4 | Kazakhstan | 8 | Dominican Rep | 8 | ||||||
21 | Wales | 39 | Botswana | 4 | Lebanon | 7 | El Salvador | 6 | ||||||
22 | Slovenia | 35 | Namibia | 4 | Iraq | 6 | Honduras | 5 | ||||||
23 | Romania | 33 | Burkina Faso | 3 | Sri Lanka | 6 | St Kitts & Nevi | 3 | ||||||
24 | NorthIreland | 29 | Rwanda | 3 | Nepal | 4 | Suriname | 2 | ||||||
25 | Luxembourg | 27 | Cape Verde | 2 | Cambodia | 3 | Bahamas | 1 | ||||||
26 | Slovakia | 22 | Ethiopia | 2 | Jordan | 3 | Belize | 1 | ||||||
27 | Lithuania | 19 | Malawi | 2 | Oman | 3 | Guyana | 1 | ||||||
28 | Estonia | 17 | Cote Ivoire | 1 | Qatar | 3 | TrinidadTobago | 1 | ||||||
29 | Croatia | 14 | Gambia | 1 | Bhutan | 1 | ||||||||
30 | Bulgaria | 10 | Liberia | 1 | Brunei | 1 | ||||||||
31 | Latvia | 7 | Mali | 1 | Hong Kong | 1 | ||||||||
32 | Serbia | 7 | Mauritius | 1 | Myanmar | 1 | ||||||||
33 | Ukraine | 7 | Seychelles | 1 | ||||||||||
34 | Iceland | 6 | ||||||||||||
35 | Malta | 4 | ||||||||||||
36 | Armenia | 3 | ||||||||||||
37 | Bosnia (BIH) | 2 | ||||||||||||
38 | Belarus | 1 | ||||||||||||
39 | Moldova | 1 | ||||||||||||
40 | Monaco | 1 | ||||||||||||
Totals | 9646 | 352 | 1678 | 31513 | 5666 | 618 | 111 |
Institutions | Publications | Country |
---|---|---|
Univ Sao Paulo (USP) | 1594 | Brazil |
Univ Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) | 1059 | Mexico |
Univ Estatal de Campinas (UNICAMP) | 762 | Brazil |
Univ Fed Minas Gerais (UFMG) | 760 | Brazil |
Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados (Cinvestav) | 686 | Mexico |
Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro UFRJ | 590 | Brazil |
Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS | 451 | Brazil |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) | 449 | Argentina |
Instituto Politecnico Nacional (IPN) | 391 | Mexico |
Univ Chile | 384 | Chile |
Univ Fed Parana (UFPR) | 374 | Brazil |
Univ Fed Pernambuco (UFPE) | 361 | Brazil |
Univ Estado Paulista (UNESP) | 360 | Brazil |
Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) | 342 | Brazil |
TecNM-IT Tijuana | 340 | Mexico |
Univ Buenos Aires | 333 | Argentina |
Instituto Tecnologico de Estudios Superiores Monterrey ITESM) | 319 | Mexico |
Univ Brasilia | 304 | Brazil |
Univ Nacl Colombia | 297 | Colombia |
Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile | 293 | Chile |
Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana | 292 | Brazil |
Univ Fed Goias (UFG) | 292 | Brazil |
Univ Fed Uberlandia (UFU) | 261 | Brazil |
Univ Fed Santa Catarina (UFSC) | 254 | Brazil |
Univ Fed Vicosa | 230 | Brazil |
Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) | 225 | Brazil |
Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio de Janeiro | 224 | Brazil |
Univ Fed Sao Carlos (UFSCAR) | 219 | Brazil |
Universidad de Guadalajara (UdeG) | 215 | Mexico |
Univ Nacl La Plata (UNLP) | 208 | Argentina |
Fdn Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) | 203 | Brazil |
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The scientific activity in LA has been scarce compared with the research production in developed countries.[38] Some authors have emphasized that this situation involves two factors: (1) there is a low investment in science and technology in most of the LA countries, and (2) the research infrastructure is deficient with a very low number of active researchers.[40–42] Even more, the LA governments and enterprises prefer to buy new technology instead of promoving the research activity within their own countries.[43]
In this context, it is impressive the research activity carried out in some LA countries like Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Chile and Colombia, in the field of evolutionary computation. Most of this activity has been developed with international collaborators[41] with an impressive number of publications that have also generated a great deal of citations. In LA, this research field has been recognized as a frontier subject within a transdisciplinary approach.[11] Our findings indicate that there is a steady growth of publications and citations in this research field. This output became important since the 1990s, 30 years after the first publications in this field appeared in mainstream journals. The consolidation of this research field is evident since the year 2000 with a large number of scholars and institutions active in several LA countries.[42] The LA academic institutions, like universities and research centers, have been the most productive in subject areas like genetic algorithms, metaheuristics, neural networks, epidemiology, education research, star formation, and others.
Several public policies have boosted this area of knowledge. In particular, the Union of South American Countries (UNASUR) have contributed to improve the scientific activity in this geographical region.[43] Some areas of knowledge have received increasing attention since 1990, in particular the social studies of science, computational sciences, and the applications of technological infrastructure.[44] The research in computational sciences has been supported traditionally by some LA governments as a tool to improve the economic growth, as it has been the case in developed countries.[45] Blandon has emphasized that the academic communities should make a better effort in improve the industrial progress in each country. This is particularly true in the case of evolutionary computation in the software and hardware sectors.
To summarize our results, it was found that there are very few analyses of the LA production on evolutionary computation. In the present work we have used the bibliometric method in order to determine the evolution of this research field. However, there are some other aspects of this research field that need to be analyzed such as the characterization of graduated programs. Finally, our findings indicate there is an impressive increase in the number of publications in this research field, and in our opinion a question is relevant: Is there enough infrastructure in LA in order to attend this pattern?
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors appreciate the support from SNI and Conacyt (Mexico, research project P-A-S1-9013). The authors also thank to Professor Carlos Artemio Coello Coello for useful suggestions in the subject.
References
- Bourdieu P. El campo científico. Redes:revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia. 1994;1(2):129-60. [Google Scholar]
- . Las formas de capital. el Manual de la teoría y la investigación para la sociología de la educación. 1994:241-58. [Google Scholar]
- Bourdieu P. El oficio del científico:ciencia de la ciencia y reflexividad / Curso del College de France 2000-2001 (Traducción de Jouaquín Jordá). Barcelona:Anagrama. 2003:1-12. [Google Scholar]
- . La sociología de la ciencia:investigaciones teóricas y empíricas. Recopilación e introducción de. 1973 [Google Scholar]
- Zucker LG. Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology. 1987;13:443-64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2083256 [Google Scholar]
- Fagerberga J, Verspagen B. Innovation studies. The emerging structure of a new scientific field Research Policy. 2009;38(2):218-33. [Google Scholar]
- Guarido-Filho ER, Machado da Silva C, Rossoni L. The social and intellectual dimensions in the construction of scientific knowledge:the institutional theory in organization studies in Brazil. BAR Curitiba. 2010;7(2):136-54. [Google Scholar]
- Tomás-Górriz V, y Tomás-Casterá V. La Bibliometría en la evaluación de la actividad científica. Hospital a Domicilio. 2018;2(4):145-63. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Espinosa M, Alexandra C, Romero, Efrén R, Flórez Leidy Y G, Guerrero Cesar D. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação. 2020;1137(28):110-22. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Santana-Quintero L, Coello-Coello CA. Una introducción a la computación evolutiva y algunas de sus aplicaciones en economía y finanzas. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa. 2006;2:3-26. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- . Introducción a la computación evolutiva. Computación Evolutiva. 2019 http://delta.cs.cinvestav.mx/~ccoello/compevol/tarea5-2018.pdf
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Rojas MG, Olivera AC, Carballido JA, Vidal PJ. A Memetic Cellular Genetic Algorithmfor Cancer Data Microarray Feature Selection. IEEE latin America Transactions. 2020;18(11):1874-1883. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9398628
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Pineda-Cortés LA. La computación en México por especialidades académicas. México:Academia Mexicana de Computación;. 2017:297 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Melián-Batista B, Moreno-Pérez JA, Moreno-Vega JM. Introducción a la computación evolutiva. Números, Revista de Didáctica de las Matemáticas. 2009;71:21-27. https://1library.co/document/q73l5eny-introduccion-computacion-evolut iva-numeros-revista-didactica-matematicas.html
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Fraser AS. Simulation of Genetic Systems by Automatic Digital Computers I Introduction. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 1957a;10(4):484-91. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Fraser AS. Simulation of Genetic Systems by Automatic Digital Computers II Effects ofLinkage on Rates of Advance Under Selection. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 1957b;10(4):150-62. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Fogel DB. Evolutionary Computation. The Fossil Record. Selected Readings on the History of Evolutionary Algorithms. 1998 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- . Optimization through evolution and recombination. Self-Organizing Systems. 1962:93-106. http://www-public.int-evry.fr/~gibson/Teaching/CS C4504/ReadingMaterial/Bremermann62.pdf
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Afonso AR. Brazilian Portuguese Text Clustering Based on Evolutionary Computing. IEEE Latin America Transactions. 2016;14(7):3370-7. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Rincón J. Aplicación de algoritmos genéticos en la optimización del sistema de abastecimiento de agua de Barquisimeto-Cabudare. Avances en Recursos Hidráulicos. 2006;14:25-38. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1450/145020399002.pdf
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Velez-Langs O, Santos C. Sistemas Recomendadores:Un enfoque desde los algoritmos genéticos. Industrial Data. 2006;9(1):23-31. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/816/81690104.pdf
- Rodríguez MP, Cortes KA, Méndez AB, Garza HH. Análisis de portafolio por sectores mediante el uso de algoritmos genéticos:caso aplicado a la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores Sectorial portfolio analysis with genetic algorithms:case applied to the Mexican Stock Exchange. Contaduría y Administración. 2015;60(1):87-112. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Suárez V, Guerreo A, Castrillón O. Programación de Horarios Escolares basados en Ritmos Cognitivos usando un Algoritmo Genético de Clasificación No-dominada, NSGA-II / Scheduling of School Hours based on Cognitive Rhythms using a Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm, NSGA-II. Información tecnológica. 2013;24(1):103-114. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Borges-Vasconcellos D, Puch-González P, Frías-González G. Control de demanda eléctrica aplicando algoritmos genéticos / Control of electric demand applying genetic algorithms. Ingeniare Revista chilena de ingeniería. 2017;25(3):389-398. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Delgado E, Cortés CJ, Duarte O. Aplicación de algoritmos genéticos para la programación de tareas en una celda de manufactura. Ingeniería e Investigación. 2005;25(2):24-31. http://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/RIAI/article/view/9257/9280
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Schab E, Rivera R, Bracco L, Coto F, Cristaldo P, Ramos L, Rapesta N, Nuñez JP, Retamar S, Casanova C, De Battista A, et al. Minería de datos y visualización de información. InXX Workshop de Investigadores en Ciencias de la Computación (WICC 2018, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste). 2018 http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/67382/Documento_completo.pdf-PDFA.pdf?sequence=1
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Tinós R. Artificial neural network based crossover for evolutionary algorithms. Applied Soft Computing. 2020;95:106512 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Cruz-Salinas AF, Perdomo JG. Self-adaptation of genetic operators through genetic programming techniques. In:Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. 2017:913-920. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Zenil-Chávez H. Computación ecolutiva y sistemas complejos adaptativos:la sopa primigenia de las conductas inteligentes emergentes. Ciencia. 2005:70-81. abril-junio [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Marrero A, Segredo EY, León C. Combinación de computación evolutiva y aprendizaje automatizado en la resolución de problemas de optimización. In:Conference:Doctoral Consortium (october 2018, Granada, CAEPIA). 2018:1-7. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Osorio CO, Vanegas ET, Valencia-Arias A. Inteligencia de negocios en el sector agrario:un análisis bibliométrico. En:Díalogos de Ciencias Sociales, Económicas y Administrativas:Perspectivas, tendencias y retos. 2020:142-54. Bogotá:Universidad de Asturias [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Shen L, Xiong B, Li W, Lan F, Evans R, Zhang W, et al. Visualizing Collaboration Characteristics and Topic Burst on International Mobile Health Research:Bibliometric Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(6) [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Raza B, Ahmad R, Nasir MH, Fauzi SS. Socio-Technical Congruence as an Emerging Concept in Software Development:A Scientometric Analysis and Critical Literature Review. IEEE Access. 2021;9 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- De Lorenzo A, Bartoli A, Castelli M, Medvet E, Xue B. Genetic programming in the twenty-first century:a bibliometric and content-based analysis from both sides of the fence. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines. 2020;21:181-204. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Paul J, Criado AR. The art of writing literature review:What do we know and what do we need to know?. International Business Review. 2020;29(4):101717 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Paul J, Lim WM, O’Cass A, Hao AW, Bresciani S. Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews (SPAR4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2021;45(5):1147-62. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Albornoz M. Desarrollo y políticas públicas en ciencia y tecnología en América Latina. Revista de Investigaciones Políticas y Sociológicas. 2009;8(1):65-75. https://www.red alyc.org/pdf/380/38011446006.pdf
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Valles M, del C, Jasso J, Nuñez I. (Coords). Ciencia, tecnología, innovación y desarrollo. México:FCE:UNAM. 2016:214 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Quintanilla-Montoya AL. La ciencia y su producción de conocimiento en América Latina. Investigación Ambiental. 2010;2(1):83-91. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7587644
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article /pii/S0186104215721480
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Cepeda-Ávila KS, Pazmiño-Iturralde L, Medrano-Freire E. Evolución de la Investigación Científica en América Latina. Revista Científica Mundo de la Investigación y el Conocimiento. 2018;2(2):464-476. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kreimer P, Vessuri H. Latin American science, technology, and society:a historical and reflexive approach. Tapuya:Latin American Science, Technology and Society. 2018;1(1):17-37. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- . Scientific productivity and the dynamics of self-organizing networks:Ibero-American and Caribbean Countries (1966–2013). Trends and Challenges in Science and Higher Education. 2016;3:29-46. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-20964-7.pdf
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Lozano M. El nuevo contrato social sobre la ciencia:retos para la comunicación de la ciencia en américa latina. Razón y Palabra. 2008;65(13):1-19. https://www.redalyc.or g/pdf/1995/199520724009.pdf
[CrossRef] | [Google Scholar] - Blandón JC. Tendencias en ciencias de la computación. Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería. 2021;14(27):19-28. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]