Contents
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
The concept of industrial revaluation 4.0 has become a widely accepted idea. Good Human Resource Management (HRM) is necessary for an organization to be successful. Determining the road map for improving the human resource management in industrial sector requires gaining an initial awareness of the body of knowledge regarding HRM in the context of Sector 4.0. Our objective was accomplished through a methodological examination of the literature. It also involves a plan and an approach that is consistent for the process of effectively managing personnel in the industry. Through a scientometric study, we attempted to conduct an effective examination of A review on the 4.0 Industrial Revolution and Its Impact on Human Resource Management Trends. The entire study makes use of Scopus as its database, and the years 2012 to 2023 are considered to be the era under examination. According to the findings of the publication study, the number of publications in Scopus is growing at a rate of 53.44% each year. This research was a collaborative effort between 2800 different researchers who published 916 documents, out of which 32.86% were written by authors from multiple countries. here were 30.39 citations on average per document. As a result of this analysis, we concluded that research in this field may be maintained to better understand the industrial revolution and its impact on human resource management, both of which are effective means by which organizations can be controlled.
INTRODUCTION
The German government initiated the industrial revolution in 2011. Where it has gained more importance from scholars.[1] Rather Industrial 4.0 the term 4.0 industrial revolution used. It is more similar, Often in many countries and industries.[2] The main objective of the industrial revolution is the technology installation of the automotive.[3] Every sector’s business model is being upended and altered because of the availability and widespread adoption of cutting-edge technologies such as augmented reality nanotechnology Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Internet of Things (IoT), which have drastically replaced technological advancements since the 1960s.[4] The term “4th Industrial Revolution,” “Industry 4.0,” or “I4.0”[5] refers to this change in production paradigms, which has had a significant impact on employees’ work routines and habits.[6] This has also made scholars aware of the significance of Human Resource Management (HRM) in the shift towards the new technological paradigm.[7] Industry 4.0 is changing how people work, learn, lead, manage, recruit, and interact with each other.[8] It is serving as a new strategic instrument for competitiveness and offering the right mix of technologies to overcome the productivity challenge.[9] Decentralization, individual empowerment, less formal regulations, horizontal communication, and cooperation are acknowledged as important characteristics of the industry 4.0 scenario. The COVID-19 pandemic[10] and global wars[11] are only two of the new and unprecedented difficulties that make the implementation of the industry 4.0 paradigm more imperative. Lockdowns, a shortage of raw materials, interrupted services, and declining supply prices are just a few of the severe consequences of these crises that businesses may overcome with the use of technological and organizational advances and effective HRM practices.[12] The advent of the digital revolution has had a profound impact on society as a whole, with industry being significantly affected. This influence has been so pervasive that the notion of Industry 4.0 has now gained universal recognition and has become firmly established. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawback of placing too much focus on technology, as it may result in a diminished recognition of the fundamental importance of human resources Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawback of placing too much focus on technology, as it may result in a diminished recognition of the fundamental importance of human resources.[13]
The European Commission has called for increased focus from the research and industrial sectors on the human dimension, among other areas of concern. HRM technology solutions are being quickly used by organizations across all industries. The driving force behind this phenomenon is the imperative to engage in competition for business prospects on both local and worldwide scales. Additionally, organizations face the difficulty of attracting and retaining employees in a labor market that is fiercely competitive,[14] marked by increasing differences in skill levels.
Address Based on the results of the HR Federation survey, the aggregate worth of venture capital investments in the global HR technology sector surpassed USD 3.1 billion in 2018, indicating a substantial rise of nearly threefold compared to the previous year’s investment volume.[15] In order to optimize the benefits derived from investments in HRM technologies, it is imperative for firms to ensure that digital transformation is aligned with their overarching corporate strategy. In order to align employee behaviors with the organization’s goal, it is imperative to establish human resources procedures. According to the alignment of HR practices with organizational strategy facilitates the attainment of optimal digital transformation, ultimately leading to superior performance.[16] The existing literature reveals a multitude of intricate hypotheses that establish connections between human resource activities. In conducted research. In their research and their study provided a comprehensive examination[17] of the research in relation to these theories, demonstrating that they offer a disparate portrayal. Firstly, it is important to note that there exist conceptual distinctions that underlie the many studies being discussed. Secondly, it is worth mentioning that the results obtained from these studies exhibit variations.
The process of planning, organizing, and supervising the work of an organization’s current staff in order to successfully carry out the purpose, vision, and objectives of the organization is known as human resource management, or HRM. The processes of hiring, choosing, training, paying, keeping, and motivating employees are all included in the above listed operations. The team in charge of Human Resource Management (HRM) is in charge of creating and executing policies and procedures that support and uphold worker safety. The HRM team is in charge of monitoring adherence to national and local regulations that protect employees’ private information and advance their physical, mental, and emotional health.[18]
Organizations of all sizes and in a variety of industries rely on Human Resource Management (HRM) to make sure their business operations run smoothly and successfully Knowledge. In order to optimize the benefits derived from investments in HRM technologies, it is imperative for firms to ensure that digital transformation is aligned with their overarching corporate strategy. In order to align employee behaviors with the organization’s goal, it is imperative to establish human resources procedures. The alignment of HR practices with organizational strategy facilitates the attainment of optimal digital transformation, ultimately leading to outstanding results.[16] A business standpoint, the significant emergence of HRM 4.0 signifies that organizations recognize the advantages of incorporating technology. However, in terms of research, there remains a lack of comprehensive examination regarding the extent of transformations resulting from the implementation of the HRM 4.0 paradigm and its implications for employees, the company, and society as a whole[17] as well as emphasized the necessity for additional exploration into the correlation between Human Resource Management (HRM) and technology.[19] An investigation was conducted to examine the present condition of HR analytics and its prospective ramifications.[20]
Technology from an industry 4.0 viewpoint for HRM and innovation
Researchers who work on this subject often use an “inward-looking” viewpoint.[21] They have examined the functions that digital technology performs throughout the HRM lifecycle. to enhance process efficiency and worker and operator well-being. These studies usually center on digital technology, with HRM serving as the application area. The use of tools, models, processes, and infrastructures in the workplace, as well as the management and organizational fallout, have all been explored by academics. There are many difficulties. First, a more thorough assessment of the revolutionary effects of the modern technologies-such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), robots, augmented and virtual reality, etc., -on operators and work environments is required, even over an extended period of time[22] Second, the virtualization of work has had a significant influence on workplaces and work routines as a secondary consequence of the current crisis; the amount of this impact at the organizational and individual levels is still up for debate. We propose that a more thorough comprehension of the following subtopics is necessary:
Collaboration between humans and machines
As technology and robots are increasingly widely used in the workplace, people will need to work together more and more. Future studies in this field need to look at the optimal methods for collaborating between humans and machines.[23] Including how to create and carry out procedures that optimize the positive effects and reduce the negative ones.
Data governance and security
With the growing volume of data generated by Industry 4.0 technologies, HR departments must make sure that data is collected, handled, and safely kept. Additionally, they have to ensure that the company’s responsibilities for ethical and legal compliance are met by the data governance policies.[24] The consequences of industry 4.0 on employee privacy and data security should be studied in research, along with the best ways to safeguard employee data in an automated workplace.
Novel approaches to employee engagement and representation
Industry 4.0 and the advancement of digital technology may open up new channels for employee representation and participation in decision-making, such as employee-driven innovation portals, virtual works councils, and digital employee representation platforms.[25] There is a research potential in this area to look at how these innovative forms of employee participation and involvement affect companies, employees, and labor relations.
HRM 4.0: Enhancing Performance with Industry: A Management and Organization Perspective Technologies 4.0
Scholars are intrigued by the ways in which Industry 4.0 technologies impact the performance of organizations. Of the HRM process as well as the organizational. Elements of HRM more broadly. Academics may expand their knowledge of the success- and failure-related facets of Human-Machine Interaction (HMI) throughout many stages of workers’ lives, such as education, employment, job profile, qualifications, competency mapping, and capacity upgrading. The safety and security components of regular activities should get special attention. The primary cause of the difficulties is the need to comprehend how to innovate HRM theory and practice in order to keep up with the quick speed of technological advancement.
HRM 5.0, Industry 4.0 critiques and industry 5.0 talks taking sustainability issues into account
Innovation Academics that study this subject often use an “outward-looking” viewpoint.[21] Adopting Industry 4.0 technology no longer has performance optimization as its primary goal. Conversely, researchers are looking for ways to help organizations, businesses, and society as a whole promote resilience and sustainability. In general, people see the organization as a component of a larger framework. In these early phases of the industry 5.0 paradigm, there are opportunities for researchers to examine models and techniques to direct the adoption of technology, both theoretically and practically. To understand how digital technologies may become engines for accomplishing socially conscious aims, additional study is necessary. The novelty of the topic presents challenges since research methodologies are still being solidified and long-term evaluation of scientific achievements is required.
Additional theoretical exploration is required to better understand the function of individuals within an increasingly digitalized industry. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the existing body of knowledge in the academic literature pertaining to the management of human resources within the industry 4.0 paradigm is evolving to become “Industry 5.0” or “I5.0”.[26] This is a more resilient, sustainable, and human-centered approach. Improving large-scale manufacturing processes’ efficiency is the main goal of Industry 4.0. As opposed to this, Industry 5.0 priorities sustainability and resilience.[27] Within the framework of the industrial revolution, placing a larger emphasis on people and society.[28] Sector 5.0 framework of Industry 4.0 is a crucial initial undertaking in order to establish a strategic plan for augmenting the role of human capital within a digital industrial setting. The industry 4.0 paradigm as it exists today is undergoing a shift towards a more human-cantered, sustainable, and resilient approach, commonly referred to as “Industry 5.0” or “I5.0”[26] Improving large-scale manufacturing processes’ efficiency is the main goal of Industry 4.0. As opposed to this, Industry 5.0 priorities sustainability and resilience within the framework of the industrial revolution, placing a larger emphasis on people and society.[28] Sector 5.0 has garnered the interest of researchers who may not have previously been inclined towards the technological aspects of Industry 4.0.[27] Assert that Industry 5.0 encompasses two primary aspects. Firstly, it emphasizes the importance of people’ competencies, expertise, and capacity to collaborate effectively with machines and robots. Secondly, it highlights the significance of adaptability in production processes and the mitigation of environmental consequences. This is crucial for the development of efficient HRM strategies that can effectively tackle the obstacles and capitalize on the opportunities presented by this emerging paradigm. They encourage further research to evaluate Industry 4.0’s effects in order to create HRM methods that are suitable for addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by this new paradigm. On various stakeholders in their evaluation and research for the HRM 4.0 future agenda. It appears that the literature underrepresents the corpus of knowledge on HRM 4.0 at this point. The current study intends to apply bibliometrics to analyses the following themes through a scientometric approach:
Q1. How is the literature on HRM evolving and being organized in relation to Industry 4.0?
Q2. Which writers, nations, and organizations in HRM 4.0 throughout the Industrial Revolution are the most productive?
Q3. In what manner is the literature on Human Resource Management (HRM) evolving and being organized with respect to the concept of Industry 4.0?
Q4. What are the primary subjects explored in previous scholarly investigations?
Q5. What are the potential areas of research in the field of Human Resource Management that hold promise for researchers in the future?
The aim of this research is to perform a thorough examination of the current body of literature concerning Human Resource Management (HRM) and its connection to the industrial revolution. Additionally, this research seeks to elucidate the internal framework and progression of HRM research. In this part, we identify a trustworthy approach for data collection and relevant bibliometric approaches.
This document offers a comprehensive and organized overview of the primary areas of study within this particular discipline. Additionally, it outlines potential avenues for future research by highlighting unresolved inquiries and insufficiency in the current body of literature, thereby facilitating the advancement of the field by upcoming academics. In order to address these inquiries, a comprehensive examination of scholarly literature was undertaken.[29] This involved the collection and analysis of scientific papers sourced from the Scopus. The primary outcome of this study involves the identification and subsequent discussion of three key topics that characterize the research domain under investigation. The following subjects are: The technological aspect of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) encompasses research on the ways in which I4.0 technologies facilitate Human Resource Management (HRM). The human-centric viewpoint entails investigations into the effects of I4.0 on Human Resources (HR) and the optimal design and implementation of technologies to promote societal benefits and enhance human welfare. The present analysis focuses on the organizational viewpoint, specifically examining scholarly articles that discuss the advantages of adopting Industry 4.0 technology in conjunction with Human Resources (HR) operations. Based on the aforementioned analyses, we propose a comprehensive agenda for further study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We hosted an SLR with the goal of summarizing the academic research on the relationship between HRM and Industry 4.0. In accordance with Transfield,[30] SLR criteria, the three primary elements of the research procedure that we implemented are the selection and placement of papers, screening, and findings presentation/included. We have analyzed 503 publications using bibliometrics between 2011 and 2023.gathered from Scopus using the features and methodologies of study from other scholarly bibliometric studies that have been published.[31] It is a type of Systematic Literature Review (SLR) Method. Stages of the methods shows in Figure 1. This stage provides extensive collection of research data, encompassing patents, grants, publications, citations, and clinical trials. The bibliometric approach has gained traction as a means of analyzing literature and locating research by employing keywords.[32]

Figure 1:
Method adopted in this study. Source: Authors created.
Additionally, bibliographic mappings and keyword co-occurrences were analyzed for this study using the Visuals of Similarities (Vos) viewer software. Indonesia’s[33] Based on historical data, our study displays network analysis and visual graphs. individual research output and is intended to show the volume and scope of interest in a publication.[34] Furthermore, the research processes pertaining to the approach have been designed. The study’s methodological approach is depicted in Figure 2.

Figure 2:
Flow diagram of the strategy. Source: Authors construction based on Scopus database.
Search Query
The following search term was typed into the Scopus data search area.
Title-Abs-Key
Industrial and revolution, or its effects on human resources, management, and human behavior, and pub years >2010 and <2024.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This study conducted a scientific assessment of publications on HRM and INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION that have been published over the last two decades, with the aim of summarizing the present state of research in this field and identifying potential future research directions.[35] In order to investigate the annual count of publications, research institutions, nations and regions, subject directions, highly cited references, and highly cited journals, the current study used visual analysis. The keyword analysis’s findings were summarized through scientometric analysis through Biblioshiny a shiny R package used widely by the researchers. This work targets to provide a systematic analysis of what research work is being undertaken, who did that work, what are the future directions.[36]
Scientometric Investigations
The academic community has used to extensively as a source of Scientometric data to review the Scientometric data on industrial revolution. Level of keywords applied for Scopus database focusing on the period of 2011 to 2023 and the keywords are taken industrial revolution and HRM. The dataset presented spans from 2011 to 2023 and is sourced from a comprehensive collection of 379 distinct references, comprising academic journals, literary works, and several other document kinds. The dataset being analyzed consists of 503 documents, demonstrating a significant annual growth rate of 18.38%. The collection primarily consists of recent research, as indicated by the relatively low average age of the papers, which is 2.6 years. The dataset exhibits an average citation count of approximately 15.92 per document, suggesting a noteworthy level of influence and impact associated with the publications encompassed within the dataset. Furthermore, it is worth noting that these documents, when considered as a whole, contain a substantial number of citations, totaling 22697. After rigorous analysis, the documents contain 2874 Keywords Plus (ID) and 1593 Author’s Keywords (DE). This shows that the dataset covers several topics and research interests.
These publications include 1595 authors, 96 of whom are solely responsible for their works. An average of 3.37 co-authors per document shows collaboration is common. A significant number of 18.69% of these links are global, indicating significant global research collaboration in the dataset. Most documents in the collection are articles (227), followed by conference papers (150), books (17) book chapters (72), reviews (29), editorials (3), and short surveys (2). The multiple document categories suggest a wide range of research outputs, including original research, literature reviews, and conference contributions. This provides a comprehensive view of scholarly work across the era and from many sources. Overall, the dataset shows a dynamic and diverse collection of scholarly publications.
Its rapid growth, international cooperation, and wide range of study subjects and document formats make it stand out. Therefore, it is useful for bibliometric analysis and research evaluation. In Table 1 we can see mean total citation per. The x-axis and Y-axis be used to create a graph that shows which years citation an increase and reduction in the average number of articles. 2012’s annual average citation per document n=11 and in the year 2012 mean TC per year 2.95 mean Total Citation (TC) 35.36. Annual average citation in the year 2015 row 5 to shows that n=16, mean total citation per year 11.11 as well shown in the Figure 3 mean per document 100 at row 5, annual citation in the year 2022 row 12 shown below at the Table 2 total citation is 2 and mean total citation per year 4.39 mean total citation per year 2.19, N is given 93 which is shown below Figure 4.

Figure 3:
Annual scientific production. (Source: author created by using origin pro).

Figure 4:
The average citation annually in the area of industry 4.0 revolution. (Source: Authors construction based on Scopus database).
Year | Mean TC per Art | N | Mean TC per Year | Citable Years |
---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 29 | 7 | 2.23 | 13 |
2012 | 35.36 | 11 | 2.95 | 12 |
2013 | 22.27 | 11 | 2.02 | 11 |
2014 | 12.38 | 13 | 1.24 | 10 |
2015 | 100 | 16 | 11.11 | 9 |
2016 | 8.83 | 12 | 1.1 | 8 |
2017 | 6.3 | 20 | 0.9 | 7 |
2018 | 39.34 | 29 | 6.56 | 6 |
2019 | 12.36 | 59 | 2.47 | 5 |
2020 | 21.48 | 91 | 5.37 | 4 |
2021 | 10.23 | 88 | 3.41 | 3 |
2022 | 4.39 | 93 | 2.19 | 2 |
Annual scientific production presented table and figure below where yearly wise analysis selected data from scopus in the year 2011-2023, industrial revoluation 4.0 continous growing in the year 2011 its 7 articles table repersented below 2023 its 53 articles but in the year 2022 it was 93 scientificaly growth german governamanet goal was competitive, flexible, digitalized production.[37] The average citation per year increase upto2020 then again, its decrease compares to previous year in the year 2021 it 88.
Most Relevant Authors Corresponding Author’s Countries and Country Scientific Production The author who has had the biggest influence on the topic of the fourth industrial revolution will be highlighted in Table 5. The authors of this research were connected to the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Fractionalized 0.645 and Pane article 6. Zou c Table 2 below displays the fractionalized 0.64518815 and article 5 papers total from stacho z represented fractionalized 1.28333. countries scientific production. The frequency of China is 180, India is 140, Indonesia is 119, and South Africa is 87. The top author and top nations are displayed in the Table 2 below as well Figure 5 presented in graphically by using original pro.

Figure 5:
Most relevant authors. Source: author creation by using the Scopus Database (2011-2022).
Authors | Articles | Articles Fractionalized | Region | Freq |
---|---|---|---|---|
PAN S | 6 | 0.64518815 | CHINA | 180 |
ZOU C | 6 | 0.64518815 | INDIA | 140 |
STACHO Z | 5 | 1.28333333 | INDONESIA | 119 |
STACHOVÁ K | 5 | 1.28333333 | SOUTH AFRICA | 87 |
WANG Y | 5 | 0.53566434 | USA | 87 |
XIONG B | 5 | 0.502331 | UK | 82 |
LIN M | 4 | 0.33566434 | GERMANY | 68 |
MA F | 4 | 0.33566434 | ITALY | 65 |
ZHANG G | 4 | 0.33566434 | SPAIN | 58 |
ZHAO sQ | 4 | 0.46336996 | BRAZIL | 51 |
Most citated countries Trend topics
The Table 3 below appears that, the top ten countries with the highest number of citations. GERMANY most cited country ranks first with an average article citation of 704 and a total citation count of 6211. With the year 2011-2023 in the area of industrial revolution 4.0 total citation received with used of bibliometric analysis. The publication outlets of the most cited papers are shown in Table 3, where the journal with the most citations on the topic under investigation is Computers and Industrial Engineering (n=4), with over 30 citations. The graph also illustrates the citation data for United Kingdom, which has a total citation count of 668 and an average citation count of 44.5. The Table 4 below displays the total number of citations for India, which is 292, and the average citation per article, which is 12.7. Similarly, Saudi Arabia has a total citation count of 277 and an average article citation of 92.3. I have selected the top ten nations for analysis and visualized the data in a graph using Excel and bibliophagy. This approach allows us the condition of countries with the elevated citation counts.
Authors | Year | Title | Journal | Total Citations | TC per year | Local Citations | LC/GC Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., and Padovano, A.[38] | 2017 | Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. | Computers and industrial engineering. | 285 | 47,50 | 21 | 7,37 |
Benešová, A., and Tupa, J.[40] | 2017 | Requirements for education and qualification of people in Industry 4.0. | Procedia manufacturing. | 259 | 43,17 | 14 | 5,41 |
Tambe, P.[41] | 2014 | Big data investment, skills, and firm value. | Management science. | 185 | 20,56 | 1 | 0,54 |
Dave, B., Kubler, S., Främling, K., and Koskela, L.[42] | 2016 | Opportunities for enhanced lean construction management using Internet of Things standards. | Automation in construction. | 146 | 20,86 | 0 | 0,00 |
Akhavian, R., and Behzadan, A. H.[43] | 2016 | Smartphone-based construction workers’ activity recognition and classification. | Automation in construction | 145 | 20,71 | 6 | 4,14 |
Fantini, P., Pinzone, M., and Taisch, M.[44] | 2020 | Placing the operator at the center of Industry 4.0 design: Modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems. | Computers and Industrial Engineering. | 123 | 41,00 | 3 | 2,44 |
Kaasinen, E., Schmalfuß, F., Özturk, C., Aromaa, S., Boubekeur, M., Heilala, J. and Walter, T.[45] | 2020 | Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions. | Computers and Industrial Engineering. | 94 | 31,33 | 8 | 8,51 |
Bag, S., Yadav, G., Dhamija, P., and Kataria, K. K.[46] | 2021 | Key resources for industry 4.0 adoption and its effect on sustainable production and circular economy: An empirical study. | Journal of Cleaner Production | 92 | 46,00 | 8 | 8,70 |
Pejic-Bach, M., Bertoncel, T., Meško, M., and Krstić, Ž.[47] | 2020 | Text mining of industry 4.0 job advertisements. | International journal of information management. | 85 | 28,33 | 5 | 5,88 |
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., and Wang, L.[48] | 2021 | Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0-Inception, conception and perception. | Journal of Manufacturing Systems. | 81 | 40,50 | 17 | 20,99 |
Longo, F., Padovano, A., and Umbrello, S.[39] | 2020 | Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in industry 5.0: A human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future. | Applied Sciences. | 79 | 26,33 | 21 | 2658 |
Whysall, Z., Owtram, M., and Brittain, S.[49] | 2019 | The new talent management challenges of Industry 4.0. | Journal of management development. | 78 | 19,50 | 12 | 15,38 |
Fareri, S., Fantoni, G., Chiarello, F., Coli, E., and Binda, A.[6] | 2020 | Estimating Industry 4.0 impact on job profiles and skills using text mining. | Computers in industry. | 76 | 25,33 | 5 | 6,58 |
Calzavara, M., Battini, D., Bogataj, D., Sgarbossa, F., and Zennaro, I.[50] | 2020 | Aging workforce management in manufacturing systems: state of the art and future research agenda. | International Journal of Production Research. | 71 | 23,67 | 2 | 2,82 |
Kazancoglu, Y., and Ozkan-Ozen, Y. D.[51] | 2018 | Analyzing Workforce 4.0 in the Fourth Industrial Revolution and proposing a road map from operations management perspective with fuzzy DEMATEL. | Journal of enterprise information management | 71 | 14,20 | 11 | 15,49 |
Ryu, J., Seo, J., Jebelli, H., and Lee, S.[52] | 2019 | Automated action recognition using an accelerometer-embedded wristband-type activity tracker. | Journal of construction engineering and management. | 68 | 17,00 | 1 | 1,47 |
Stachová, K., Papula, J., Stacho, Z., and Kohnová, L.[53] | 2019 | External partnerships in employee education and development as the key to facing industry 4.0 challenges. | Sustainability. | 67 | 16,75 | 5 | 7,46 |
Bednar, P. M., and Welch, C[54] | 2020 | Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: Creating meaningful and sustainable systems. | Information Systems Frontiers. | 61 | 20,33 | 7 | 11,48 |
Cimini, C., Boffelli, A., Lagorio, A., Kalchschmidt, M., and Pinto, R.[55] | 2020 | How do Industry 4.0 technologies influence organisational change? An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. | Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. | 55 | 27,50 | 0 | 0,00 |
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Haq, M. I. U., Raina, A., and Suman, R.[56] | 2020 | Industry 5.0: Potential applications in COVID-19. | Journal of Industrial Integration and Management. | 54 | 18,00 | 5 | 9,26 |
Hannola, L., Richter, A., Richter, S., and Stocker, A.[57] | 2018 | Empowering production workers with digitally facilitated knowledge processes-a conceptual framework | International Journal of Production Research. | 53 | 10,60 | 0 | 0,00 |
Li, D., Fast-Berglund, Å., and Paulin, D.[58] | 2019 | Current and future Industry 4.0 capabilities for information and knowledge sharing. | The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. | 52 | 13,00 | 2 | 3,85 |
Cubric, M.[59] | 2020 | Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. | Technology in Society. | 50 | 16,67 | 0 | 0,00 |
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., and Larson, B.[60] | 2021 | Work‐from‐anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. | Strategic Management Journal. | 48 | 24,00 | 0 | 0,00 |
Kipper, L. M., Iepsen, S., Dal Forno, A. J., Frozza, R., Furstenau, L., Agnes, J., and Cossul, D.[61] | 2021 | Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0. | Technology in Society. | 48 | 24,00 | 1 | 2,08 |
The topics that will be discussed the most frequently in 2017 will all be associated with indutrial revolution and will have a frequency of 9. These topics will be the most popular and will be trendy. The following graphs illustrate topics that are now trending according to the authors’ use of the key phrase “digitalization” in the year 2022 or the frequency. The term “suatinable developmenet ” has a term frequency of 14 in the year 2022, whereas the term “industry 4.0” has a term frequency of 686 in the year 2022.
Thematic mapping
The Figure 6 demonstrates how thematic mapping allows for the representation of four separate typologies related to different topics. The thematic mapping utilizes the keywords field. Themes are classified into two dominance graphs based on their density and centrality. The concept of centrality serves as a metric or indicator. The significance of a topic is demonstrated by its representation on the X-axis, while the density on the Y-axis indicates the level of development. Additionally, the centrality relevance degree is also taken into consideration. The themes are categorized into four quadrants, which will be discussed in the following sections. The upper right Quadrant (Q1) contains motor themes. These are high density and high centrality themes, indicating their significance. Below graphs shows high density key words where (Q1-Q4) digital literacy founded. Anther themes are in the upper-left Quadrant (Q2) Niche Themes. Graph represented key words, energy independence new energy, development strategy globalization, cooperatives eutrophication, the fourth industrial revolution south korea. As we can see lower-left Quadrant (Q3) Emerging or Declining Themes. But below graph shows (Q3-Q4) Manufacturing supply chain management. Lower right (Q4) Basic themes in this industry 4.0 human resources, human resource management digitalization, fourth industrial revolution artificial intelligence.

Figure 6:
Thematic mapping.
Table 4 shows that Computers and Industrial Engineering (n=4) has the most publications on the issue under investigation, with over 30 citations. The other journals that come after this are Technology in Society (n=2) International Journal of Production Research, Journal of Cleaner Production, Automation in Construction, Computers in Industry, Information Systems Frontiers, and Sustainability. The most referenced articles’ publishing channels are also included in Table 4. Below shows that Computers and Industrial Engineering (n=4) has the most publications on the issue under investigation, with over 30 citations. The other journals that come after this are Technology in Society (n=2), International Journal of Production Research, Journal of Cleaner Production, Automation in Construction, Computers in Industry, Information Systems Frontiers, and Sustainability. Interestingly[38] foundational paper “Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-cantered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context” has received the highest citations (n=285 citations) worldwide. The two articles that obtained the most local citations (i.e., citations from publications included in the analysed collection) were the same one and another by[39] (21 citations each). The primary focus of these works is on methods for improving the skills of smart operators.
Country | TC | Average Article Citations | Trend topic | freq | year_q1 | year_q3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Germany | 704 | 58.7 | Industrial revolution | 9 | 2017 | 2020 |
United Kingdom | 668 | 44.5 | Knowledge management | 7 | 2018 | 2022 |
China | 604 | 15.9 | Internet of Things (Iot) | 5 | 2018 | 2020 |
Brazil | 554 | 69.2 | Industry 4.0 | 98 | 2019 | 2022 |
India | 292 | 12.7 | Artificial intelligence | 20 | 2020 | 2021 |
Saudi Arabia | 277 | 92.3 | Sustainability | 16 | 2020 | 2022 |
Korea | 243 | 17.4 | Human resource management | 20 | 2020 | 2022 |
Italy | 188 | 17.1 | Human resources | 15 | 2020 | 2022 |
USA | 180 | 18 | Management | 11 | 2018 | 2022 |
Fourth industrial revolution | 26 | 2021 | 2022 |
Country | China | India | Indonesia | South Africa | United Kingdom | Korea | Germany | Italy | Poland | USA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles | 206 | 38 | 23 | 20 | 19 | 15 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 10 |
SCP | 176 | 33 | 18 | 19 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 8 |
MCP | 30 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Freq | 0.4095427 | 0.075547 | 0.0457256 | 0.039761431 | 0.03777336 | 0.029821074 | 0.027833 | 0.023856859 | 0.02187 | 0.0218688 | 0.0198807 |
MCP_ Ratio | 0.1456311 | 0.131579 | 0.2173913 | 0.05 | 0.052631579 | 0.26666667 | 0.21428571 | 0.33333333 | 0.27273 | 0.0909091 | 0.2 |
The most referenced articles’ publishing channels are also included. Industry 4.0’s effects on HRM are a complicated, multidimensional topic. Because the three study areas are related to one another and even complement one another, it is critical that academics adopt an integrated, multidisciplinary strategy that takes into account the many organisational, social, and technical aspects of HRM’s progress within the framework of Industry 4.0. We present a research agenda based on the findings of our Systematic Literature Review (SLR)[33] which highlights potential directions for the three study themes and identifies possibilities and problems for each. We also recommend some areas of current under research that need further investigation HRM 5.0, Industry 4.0 criticisms, and Industry 5.0 discussions that consider sustainability issues, Cooperation between machines under people technology from a certain sector A 4.0 perspective on innovation and HRM.
Bibliographic Coupling(Countries,authors, source)
The graph shows which nation has the most credible scientific sources. The VOS app used to develop the keywords associated with each source as well as how they link to one another. Below Figure 7 show that minimum number of document is 5 and minimum number of citation is 5. The figure shows item is 31 and culters 4 and link is 255, total link strength is 12541. Figure 9 shown below minimum number of document of auther 2 and minimum number of citation authour 4, maximum number of author per document 10 items 84, cluster 14 links 212, total link strenght 361. Bibliographic coupling source minimum number of doument source 5 and minimum number of citationsource is 5 items 3 and clusters 1 k;links with source. Most relevant sources according to this diagram is lecture notes in mechanical engineering number of documents are 18. Another source is Proceeding of the summer school Francesco Turco is 15. Below Figure 7 shows source Procedia is per no. of document is 13 like that another source is Procedia computer science, Procedia manufacturing, sustainability (Switzerland) and technological forecasting and social change document sources is 13.we can see the countries collaboration in between them Figure 7 exhibited below cluttering countries. Figure 7 shows which countries have the most papers published. Here, China has the most single-country publications (33), as well multiple citated publication 5 second India is single cited publication 18 and multiple citation publication is 5. Below shows that Indonesia is article are 20 and single cited publication 19 and multiple citated publication is 1.

Figure 7:
Coupling with countries.

Figure 8:
Coupling authors.

Figure 9:
Bibliographic coupling source.
CONCLUSION
The industrial sector has undergone a significant transition as a result of Industry 4.0’s new technology[62] In addition to having a significant effect on businesses’ financial and operational performance, these technologies are also gradually altering the conception and management of human resources in manufacturing facilities[63] The goal of the current study was to comprehend the primary research subjects and the structure of the body of literature that A review on the 4.0 Industrial Revolution and Its Impact on Human Resource Management Trends. This study has inspected a performance. At present, at the nascent stage of the 4.0 Industrial Revolution, envisioning the various tendencies associated with it proves to be a challenging task. The impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies on enterprises across different sectors and economies varies significantly. Even the German authors leading aspect this concept of industrial 4.0 German government has equations of other parts. The profound and dynamic transformations in the global economic environment brought about by the Fourth Industrial Revolution give rise to inquiries that warrant additional investigation pertaining to prominent multinational corporations’ energy independence new energy, development strategy globalization, cooperatives eutrophication, the fourth industrial revolution south Korea. A significant area of inquiry for potential future research pertains to the re-evaluation of the state’s function. The examination and comprehension of emerging forms of enterprises and novel business frameworks resulting from the digital revolution elicit significant scholarly curiosity. The advent of the Fourth Industrial revolt results in the redistribution and surplus of wealth from established Transnational Corporations (TNCs) in wealthy nations to their rival counterparts. The analysis of challenges encountered by major Transnational Corporations (TNCs) in the realm of digital marketing and management transformation is crucial. The contemporary advancements in technology associated with the Fourth Industrial Revolution have established the network-based structure of modern enterprises and the modular characteristics of commodities, services, and processes. One significant area of inquiry pertains to the influence of digitalization on competitiveness and rivalry within the global market.
Cite this article:
Jabeen G, Goli G, Kafila, Ravindran G, Srihita RH. A Review on the 4.0 Industrial Revolution and its Impact on Human Resource Management Trends. J Scientometric Res. 2025;14(1):1-15.
LIMITATIONS
The primary contextual constraints of the study stem from the way the research technique was implemented. First, Considering the managerial strategy that was applied, we limited the search to publications indexed in the databases’ (Scopus) business and management topic areas. Even if they collectively represent the most extensive scientific sources and have the greatest documentation, they could not include all the studies that are relevant to our problem. Second, only articles that were published in English in scholarly publications were taken into account. As a result, additional research that could have been pertinent was eliminated, including book chapters, theses, doctorate dissertations, and conference proceedings. Third, the specification of the first set of keywords and the chosen search algorithm has an impact on the results.[64] In an attempt to get around this restriction, we developed a recursive strategy that enabled us to expand the keyword sets by taking into account the terms used in the publications that we located via our evaluation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author would like to shows gratitude to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback and recommendations, which contributed to enhancing the quality of the manuscript. The authors extend particular appreciation to Dr. Gurunadham Goli, Associate Professor at the School of Business, SR University, for his mentorship and guidance.
ABBREVIATIONS
HRM | Human resource management |
---|---|
IOT | Internet of Things |
SLR | Systematic Literature Review |
ID | Keywords Plus |
DE | Author’s Keywords |
TC | Total Citations |
SCP | Single Country Publications |
MCP | Multiple Country Publications |
TNCs | Transnational Corporations. |
References
- Barreto L, Amaral A, Pereira T. Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview. Procedia Manuf.. 2017;13:1245-52. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Sung TK. Industry 4.0: a Korea perspective. Technol Forecasting Soc Change.. 2018;132:40-5. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Ślusarczyk B. Industry 4.0-are we ready?. Pol J Manag Stud.. 2018;17(1):232-48. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Müller JM, Buliga O, Voigt KI. The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models-A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises. Eur Manag J.. 2021;39(3):333-43. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Maynard AD. Navigating the fourth Industrial Revolution. Nat Nanotechnol.. 2015;10(12):1005-6. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Fareri S, Fantoni G, Chiarello F, Coli E, Binda A. Estimating Industry 4.0 impact on job profiles and skills using text mining. Comput Ind.. 2020;118:103222 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Jimeno-Morenilla A, Azariadis P, Molina-Carmona R, Kyratzi S, Moulianitis V. Technology enablers for the implementation of Industry 4.0 to traditional manufacturing sectors: a review. Comput Ind.. 2021;125:103390 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- da Silva LB, Soltovski R, Pontes J, Treinta FT, Leitão P, Mosconi E, et al. Human resources management 4.0: literature review and trends. Comput Ind Eng. Computers & Industrial Engineering.. 2022;168:108111 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Schäfer B, Koloch L, Storai D, Gunkel M, Kraus S. Alternative workplace arrangements: tearing down the walls of a conceptual labyrinth. J Innov Knowl.. 2023;8(2):100352 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Collins CJ. Expanding the resource based view model of strategic human resource management. In: Strategic human resource management and organizational effectiveness.. 2022:107-34. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Tosun OK, Eshraghi A. Corporate decisions in times of war: evidence from the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Fin Res Lett.. 2022;48:102920 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Nair S. Human resource management impediments for improving organizational competitiveness in post Covid-19 era. Energy Infrastruct Manag Post Covid.. 2022;19 Era:430 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Amarakoon U, Weerawardena J, Verreynne ML. Learning capabilities, human resource management innovation and competitive advantage. Int J Hum Resour Manag.. 2018;29(10):1736-66. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Fahimnia B, Sarkis J, Davarzani H. Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int J Prod Econ.. 2015;162:101-14. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Castagnoli R, Büchi G, Coeurderoy R, Cugno M. Evolution of industry 4.0 and international business: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Eur Manag J.. 2022;40(4):572-89. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Nicolás-Agustín Á, Jiménez-Jiménez D, Maeso-Fernandez F. The role of human resource practices in the implementation of digital transformation. Int J Manpow.. 2022;43(2):395-410. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Chang EH, Milkman KL. Improving decisions that affect gender equality in the workplace. Organ Dyn.. 2020;49(1):100709 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Cooke FL, Schuler R, Varma A. Human resource management research and practice in Asia: past, present and future. Hum Resour Manag Rev.. 2020;30(4):100778 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Prifti L, Knigge M, Kienegger H, Krcmar H. A competency model for [Industrie 4.0″ employees].. 2017 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Marler JH, Boudreau JW. An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. Int J Hum Resour Manag.. 2017;28(1):3-26. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Dumas M, Rosa LM, Mendling J, Reijers AH. Fundamentals of business process management.. 2018 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Hassoun A, Aït-Kaddour A, Abu-Mahfouz AM, Rathod NB, Bader F, Barba FJ, et al. The fourth Industrial Revolution in the food industry-Part I: Industry 4.0 technologies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr.. 2023;63(23):6547-63. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kramar R. Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach?. Int J Hum Resour Manag.. 2014;25(8):1069-89. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Al-Ruithe M, Benkhelifa E, Hameed K. A systematic literature review of data governance and cloud data governance. Personal Ubiquitous Comput.. 2019;23(5-6):839-59. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Mishra K, Boynton L, Mishra A. Driving employee engagement: the expanded role of internal communications. Int J Bus Commun.. 2014;51(2):183-202. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Breque M, De Nul L, Petridis A. Industry 5.0-towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Policy Brief.. 2021 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Zizic MC, Mladineo M, Gjeldum N, Celent L. From industry 4.0 towards industry 5.0: a review and analysis of paradigm shift for the people, organization and technology. Energies.. 2022;15(14):5221 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Adel A. Future of industry 5.0 in society: human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas. J Cloud Comput (Heidelb).. 2022;11(1):40 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kraus S, Breier M, Dasí-Rodríguez S. The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. Int Entrep Manag J.. 2020;16(3):1023-42. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag.. 2003;14(3):207-22. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Bonilla CA, Merigó JM, Torres-Abad C. Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics.. 2015;105(2):1239-52. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kessler MM. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am Doc.. 1963;14(1):10-25. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Nandiyanto AB, Al Husaeni DF. A bibliometric analysis of materials research in Indonesian journal using VOSviewer. J Eng Res.. 2021:2307-1877. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Paul J, Lim WM, O’Cass A, Hao AW, Bresciani S. Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). Int J Con Stud.. 2021;45(4):O1-O16. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Donthu N, Kumar S, Pattnaik D, Lim WM. A bibliometric retrospection of marketing from the lens of psychology: insights from Psychology and Marketing. Psychol Mark.. 2021;38(5):834-65. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kobara YM, Akpan IJ. Bibliometric performance and future relevance of virtual manufacturing technology in the fourth Industrial Revolution. Systems.. 2023;11(10):524 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Linkov I, Trump BD, Poinsatte-Jones K, Florin MV. Governance strategies for a sustainable digital world. Sustainability.. 2018;10(2):440 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Longo F, Nicoletti L, Padovano A. Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Comput Ind Eng.. 2017;113:144-59. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Longo MR, Amoruso E, Calzolari E, Ben Yehuda M, Haggard P, Azañón E, et al. Anisotropies of tactile distance perception on the face. Atten Percept Psychophys.. 2020;82(7):3636-47. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Benešová A, Tupa J. Requirements for education and qualification of people in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf.. 2017;11:2195-202. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Tambe P. Big data investment, skills, and firm value. Manag Sci.. 2014;60(6):1452-69. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Dave B, Kubler S, Främling K, Koskela L. Opportunities for enhanced lean construction management using Internet of Things standards. Autom Constr.. 2016;61:86-97. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Akhavian R, Behzadan AH. Smartphone-based construction workers’ activity recognition and classification. Autom Constr.. 2016;71:198-209. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Fantini P, Pinzone M, Taisch M. Placing the operator at the centre of Industry 4.0 design: modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems. Comput Ind Eng.. 2020;139:105058 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kaasinen E, Schmalfuß F, Özturk C, Aromaa S, Boubekeur M, Heilala J, et al. Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions. Comput Ind Eng.. 2020;139:105678 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Bag S, Yadav G, Dhamija P, Kataria KK. Key resources for industry 4.0 adoption and its effect on sustainable production and circular economy: an empirical study. J Cleaner Prod.. 2021;281:125233 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Pejic-Bach M, Bertoncel T, Meško M, Krstić Ž. Text mining of industry 4.0 job advertisements. Int J Inf Manag.. 2020;50:416-31. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Xu X, Lu Y, Vogel-Heuser B, Wang L. Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0-inception, conception and perception. J Manuf Syst.. 2021;61:530-5. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Whysall Z, Owtram M, Brittain S. The new talent management challenges of Industry 4.0. J Manag Dev.. 2019;38(2):118-29. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Calzavara M, Battini D, Bogataj D, Sgarbossa F, Zennaro I. Ageing workforce management in manufacturing systems: state of the art and future research agenda. Int J Prod Res.. 2020;58(3):729-47. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kazancoglu Y, Ozkan-Ozen YD. Analyzing Workforce 4.0 in the Fourth Industrial Revolution and proposing a road map from operations management perspective with fuzzy DEMATEL. J Enterpr Inf Manag.. 2018;31(6):891-907. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Ryu J, Seo J, Jebelli H, Lee S. Automated action recognition using an accelerometer-embedded wristband-type activity tracker. J Constr Eng Manag.. 2019;145(1):04018114 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Stachová K, Papula J, Stacho Z, Kohnová L. External partnerships in employee education and development as the key to facing industry 4.0 challenges. Sustainability.. 2019;11(2):345 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Bednar PM, Welch C. Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: creating meaningful and sustainable systems. Inf Syst Front.. 2020;22(2):281-98. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Cimini C, Boffelli A, Lagorio A, Kalchschmidt M, Pinto R. How do industry 4.0 technologies influence organisational change? An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. J Manuf Technol Manag.. 2020;32(3):695-721. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, Haq MI, Raina A, Suman R, et al. Industry 5.0: Potential Applications in COVID-19. J Ind Intg Mgmt.. 2020;5(4):507-30. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Hannola L, Richter A, Richter S, Stocker A. Empowering production workers with digitally facilitated knowledge processes-a conceptual framework. Int J Prod Res.. 2018;56(14):4729-43. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Li D, Fast-Berglund Å, Paulin D. Current and future Industry 4.0 capabilities for information and knowledge sharing: case of two Swedish SMEs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.. 2019;105(9):3951-63. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Cubric M. M. Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technol Soc.. 2020;62:101257 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Choudhury P, Foroughi C, Larson B. Work‐from‐anywhere: the productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strateg Manag J.. 2021;42(4):655-83. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kipper LM, Iepsen S, Dal Forno AJ, Frozza R, Furstenau L, Agnes J, et al. Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0. Technol Soc.. 2021;64:101454 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Sarbu M. The impact of industry 4.0 on innovation performance: insights from German manufacturing and service firms. Technovation.. 2022;113:102415 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Flores E, Xu X, Lu Y. Human Capital 4.0: a workforce competence typology for Industry 4.0. J Manuf Technol Manag.. 2020;31(4):687-703. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Nofal AM, Nicolaou N, Symeonidou N, Shane S. Biology and management: a review, critique, and research agenda. J Manag.. 2018;44(1):7-31. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]