Journal of Scientometric Research, 2019, 8, 3, 125-130.
DOI: 10.5530/jscires.8.3.27
Published: December 2019
Type: Research Article
Haris Memisevic1,*, Arnela Pasalic1, Edin Mujkanovic2, Mahira Memisevic3
1University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Sarajevo, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA.
2Herzegovina University, Department of Special Education, Mostar, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA.
3University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Science, Sarajevo, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA.
Abstract:
Background: Evaluating academic production and researchersā impact has become aĀ common practice in many areas of academic life. Researchers are being evaluated forĀ many purposes such as getting employment, promotion, tenure and winning grants.Ā Achieving full objectivity of the evaluation is a rather difficult, if not the impossible task.Ā The goal of the present paper was to evaluate research performance of scholars fromĀ Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH and to propose a single number that captures several scientometricĀ indices. Methods: We took data from 303 scholars from 4 public universitiesĀ in BiH on their number of citations andĀ h-indexes derived from four databases/services:Ā Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Research Gate. In addition to this, we performedĀ a Principal Component Analysis of number ofĀ citations andĀ h-indexes from theseĀ indices to come up with a single number that best captures the scientific impact of theĀ researchers.Ā Results:Ā The results of this study indicate a strong relationship between allĀ indices of scholarly achievement as measured through citations andĀ h– indexes. PrincipalĀ component analysis has shown that it is possible to obtain a single number that capturesĀ researchersā scientific impact. Conclusion:Ā Many metrics can be useful in evaluating researchersāĀ scientific impact. As the researchers in BiH have a low scientific production,Ā universities in BiH need to adapt a strategy to stimulate the increase in their scientificĀ productivity.